If the ISO file name is too long to displayed completely. Do I need a custom shim protocol? All of these security things are there to mitigate risks. If you do not see a massive security problem with that, and especially if you are happy to enrol the current version of Ventoy for Secure Boot, without realizing that it actually defeats the whole point of Secure Boot because it can then be used to bypass Secure Boot altogether, then I will suggest that you spend some time reading into trust chains. Secure Boot is disabled in the BIOS on both systems, and the ISO boots just fine if I write it directly to a USB stick with Fedora Image Writer. https://download.freebsd.org/releases/arm64/aarch64/ISO-IMAGES/13.1/FreeBSD-13.1-RELEASE-arm64-aarch64-disc1.iso. I have this same problem. 2. If someone has physical access to a system then Secure Boot is useless period. This ISO file doesn't change the secure boot policy. Hi, HDClone 9.0.11 ISO is stating on UEFI succesfully but on Legacy after choose "s" or "x64" to start hdclone it open's a black windows in front of the Ventoy Menu and noting happens more. Use UltraISO for example and open Minitool.iso 4. After the reboot, select Delete MOK and click Continue. TPM encryption has historically been independent of Secure Boot. No bootfile found for UEFI! Ventoy doesn't load the kernel directly inside the ISO file(e.g. In other words it will make their system behave as if Secure Boot is disabled, which they are unlikely to expect, else they would have disabled Secure Boot altogether to boot said media (which, if they control that system they can always easily do, especially if it's in a temporary fashion to boot a specific media that they know isn't Secure Boot compliant). Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB Snail LInux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefidibujo del sistema nervioso y sus partes para nios ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. debes desactivar secure boot en el bios-uefi The only way to make Ventoy boot in secure boot is to enroll the key. Yes, Ventoy does work within UEFI mode and offers a default secure boot feature. ventoy_x64.efi/ventoy_util_x64.efi ) , they do need digital signatures. 4. So, Secure Boot is not required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. I've hacked-up PreLoader once again and managed to cleanly chainload Ubuntu ISO with Secure Boot enabled. They all work if I put them onto flash drives directly with Rufus. Changed the extension from ".bin" to ".img" according to here & it didn't work. By the way, since I do want to bring that message home for people who might be tempted to place a bit too much trust in TPMs, disk encryption and Secure Boot, what the NSA would most likely do, if they wanted to access your encrypted disk data on an x86 PC, is issue a secret executive order to Intel or AMD, to design special version of the CPU they need, where the serial can be altered programmatically (so that they can clone the serial from the original CPU in case the TPM checks it) and that includes additional logic and EPROM to detect and store the critical data (such as disk decryption keys) when accessed. . This means current is ARM64 UEFI mode. https://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php?t=4997. By default, secure boot is enabled since version 1.0.76. When it asks Delete the key (s), select Yes. It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. If it fails to do that, then you have created a major security problem, no matter how you look at it. The problem of manjaro-kde-20.0-pre1-stable-staging-200406-linux56.iso in UEFI booting was an issue in ISO file , resolved on latest released ISO today : @FadeMind The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. And, unless you're going to stand behind every single Ventoy user to explain why you think it shouldn't matter that Ventoy will let any unsigned bootloader through, that's just not going to fly. Attached Files Thumbnail (s) Find Reply Steve2926 Senior Member In the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe. I guess this is a classic error 45, huh? Well, that's pretty much exactly what I suggested in points 1-4 from the original post, with point 4 altered from "an error should be returned to the user and bootx64.efi should not be launched" to "an error should be returned to the user who can then decide if they still want to launch bootx64.efi". I assume that file-roller is not preserving boot parameters, use another iso creation tool. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi . Ventoy2Disk.exe always failed to update ? But it shouldn't be to the user to do that. Yes, anybody can make a UEFI bootloader that chain loads unsigned bootloaders with the express purpose of defeating Secure Boot. Hey, I have encountered the same problem and I found that after deleting the "System Volume Information" folder on Ventoy partition of the USB disk, it can boot now. You signed in with another tab or window. Forum rules Before you post please read how to get help. It only causes problems. Maybe the image does not suport IA32 UEFI! But of course, it's your choice to pick what you think is best for your users and the above is just one opinion on the matter. fdisk: Create a primary partition with partition type EFI (FAT-12/16/32). cambiar contrasea router nucom; personajes que lucharon por la igualdad de gnero; playa de arena rosa en bahamas; for grub modules, maybe I can pack all the modules into one grub.efi and for other efi files(e.g. Keep reading to find out how to do this. chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin fails to boot on BIOS & UEFI. Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? puedes usar las particiones gpt o mbr. Then user will be clearly told that, in this case only distros whose bootloader signed with valid key can be loaded. @ventoy So that means that Ventoy will need to use a different key indeed. Option 2: Only boot .efi file with valid signature. Tested Distros (Updating) I don't have a IA32 hardware device, so I normally test it in VMware. Ventoy version and details of options chosen when making it (Legacy\MBR\reserved space) . GRUB mode fixed it! Ventoy can detect GRUB inside ISO file, parse its configuration file and load its boot elements directly, with "linux" GRUB kernel loading command. Windows 10 32bit If I wasn't aware that Ventoy uses SUISBD, I would be confused just as you by its Secure Boot "support" and lack of information about its consequences. Won't it be annoying? Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. Format UDF in Windows: format x: /fs:udf /q It's a bug I introduced with Rescuezilla v2.4. Some Legacy BIOS has an access limitation and wont read a disk that exceeds the limitation. If Ventoy was intended to be used from an internal hard disk, I would agree with you, but Ventoy is a USB-based multiboot solution and therefore the user must have physical access to the system, so it is the users responsibility to be careful about what he inserts into that USB port. Thanks very much for proposing this great OS , tested and added to report. You can use these commands to format it: I rarely get any problems with other menu systems based on grub2\grub4dos\syslinux\isolinux, just Ventoy gives problems. This could be useful for data recovery, OS re-installation, or just for booting from USB without thinking about additional steps. If you have a faulty USB stick, then youre likely to encounter booting issues. preloader-for-ventoy-prerelease-1.0.40.zip, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532, [issue]: Instead of dm-patch, consider a more secure and upstreamable solution that does not do kernel taint. The latest version of Ventoy, an open source program for Windows and Linux to create bootable media using image file formats such as ISO or WMI, introduces experimental support for the IMG file format.. Ventoy distinguishes itself from other programs of its kind, e.g. same here on ThinkPad x13 as for @rderooy debes activar modo uefi en el bios @steve6375 Of course , Added. Do NOT put the file to the 32MB VTOYEFI partition. What you want is for users to be alerted if someone picked a Linux or Microsoft media, and the UEFI bootloader was altered from the original. The error sits 45 cm away from the screen, haha. I have absolutely no problem with letting the user choose if they want to run a bootloader that failed Secure Boot validation, and I think this might be the better way to do it indeed. And we've already been over whether USB should be treated differently than internal SATA or NVMe (which, in your opinion it should, and which in mine, and I will assert the majority of people who enable Secure Boot, it shouldn't). Yes, I finally managed to get UEFI:NTFS Secure Boot signed 2 days ago, and that's part of why there's a new release of Rufus today, that includes the signed version of UEFI:NTFS. @pbatard Perform a scan to check if there are any existing errors on the USB. For the two bugs. It was actually quite the struggle to get to that stage (expensive too!) In this case you must take care about the list and make sure to select the right disk. then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. I'm afraid I'm very busy with other projects, so I haven't had a chance. Can't install Windows 7 ISO, no install media found ? The file size will be over 5 GB. Yes. If that is not the case already, I would also strongly urge everyone to consider the problem not as "People who want Secure Boot should perform extra steps to ensure that only signed executable will boot" but instead as "People who don't care about Secure Boot but have it enabled should either disable Secure Boot or perform extra steps if they want unsigned executables to boot". You literally move files around and use a text editor to edit theme.text, ventoy.json, and so on. How to mount the ISO partition in Linux after boot ? You can reformat it with FAT32/NTFS/UDF/XFS/Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 filesystem, the only request is that Cluster Size must greater than or equal to 2048. Without complex workarounds, XP does not support being installed from USB. If your PC is unable to process Ventoy as bootable media, then you may need to disable secure boot. Agreed. The current release of Slax (slax-64bit-11.2.1.iso) fails to boot using UEFI64 using ventoy with the error message: Just some of my thoughts: Currently there is only a Secure boot support option for check. Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI . When enrolling Ventoy, they do not. # Archlinux minimal Install with btrfs ## Introduction If you don't know about Arch Linux, and willing to learn, then check this post, - [Arch Linux](https://wiki . Legacy? 5. extservice Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI. Which is why you want to have as many of these enabled in parallel when they exist (such as TPM + Secure Boot, i.e. Windows 7 32-bit does not support UEFI32 - you must use Win7 64-bit.. You may need to disable Secure Boot in your BIOS settings first (or convert the ISO to a .imgPTN23 file using the MPI Tool Kit). So the new ISO file can be booted fine in a secure boot enviroment. list vol - select vol of EFI (in my case nr 14) as illustrated - assign - EFI drive is mounted as Q: Also possible is: After booting with Win10XPE from RAMDISK the Hidden EFI Driv Newbie. There are many kinds of WinPE. Download Debian net installer. Tried it yesterday. All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. 2There are two methods: Enroll Key and Enroll Hash, use whichever one. But that not means they trust all the distros booted by Ventoy. Hiren's BootCD However, I'm not sure whether chainloading of shims are allowed, and how it would work if you try to load for example Ubuntu when you already have Fedora's shim loaded. Option 2: bypass secure boot It's a pain in the ass to do yes, but I wouldn't qualify it as very hard. Else I would have disabled Secure Boot altogether, since the end result it the same. I can 3 options and option 3 is the default. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! But, considering that I've been trying for the last 5 years to rally people against Microsoft's "no GPLv3 policy" without going anywhere, and that this is what ultimately forced me to rewrite/relicense UEFI:NTFS, I'm not optimistic about it. Have a question about this project? If Secure Boot is not enabled, proceed as normal. Earlier (2014-2019) official GRUB in Ubuntu and Debian allowed to boot any Linux kernel, even unsigned one, in Secure Boot mode. So by default, you need to disabled secure boot in BIOS before boot Ventoy in UEFI mode. Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. Even though I copied the Windows 10 ISO to flash drive, which presumably has a UEFI boot image on it, neither of my Vostros would recognize it. If you burn the image to a CD, and use a USB CD drive, I bet you find it will install fine. and leave it up to the user. Ventoy has added experimental support for IA32 UEFI since v1.0.30. How to make sure that only valid .efi file can be loaded. So, Fedora has shim that loads only Fedoras files. Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. Also, what GRUB theme are you using? ISO: GeckoLinux_STATIC_Plasma.x86_64-152.200719..iso (size: 1,316MB) . @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . Yes. This means current is MIPS64EL UEFI mode. ventoy.json should be placed at the 1st partition which has the larger capacity (The partition to store ISO files). Seriously? I'm getting the same error when booting "Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso" or "pop-os_20.04_amd64_intel_8.iso" on either a new ThinkPad X13 or T14s using Ventoy 1.0.31 UEFI. Edit: Disabling Secure Boot didn't help. Okay, I installed linux mint 64 bit on this laptop before. Well occasionally send you account related emails. https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat Personally, I don't have much of an issue with Ventoy using the current approach as a stopgap solution, as long as it is agreed that this is only a stopgap, since it comes with a huge drawback, and that a better solution (validation of that the UEFI bootloaders chain loaded from GRUB pass Secure Boot validation when Secure Boot has been enabled by the user) needs to be implemented in the long run. Where can I download MX21_February_x64.iso? 2. 1.- comprobar que la imagen que tienes sea de 64 bits Boot net installer and install Debian. If anyone has an issue - please state full and accurate details. I was able to create a Rufus image using "GPT for UEFI" and the latest Windows ISO (1709 updated in 12/2017). And of course, by the same logic, anything unsigned should not boot when Secure Boot is active. (This post was last modified: 08-06-2022, 10:49 PM by, (This post was last modified: 08-08-2022, 01:23 PM by, (This post was last modified: 08-08-2022, 05:52 PM by, https://forums.ventoy.net/showthread.phpt=minitool, https://rmprepusb.blogspot.com/2018/11/art-to.html. Any kind of solution? Error description These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. Mybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! The same applies to OS/2, eComStation etc. BIOS Mode Both Partition Style GPT Disk . I checked and they don't work. Sign in Users may run into issues with Ventoy not working because of corrupt ISO files, which will create problems when booting an image file. Would MS sign boot code which can change memory/inject user files, write sectors, etc.? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. The program can be used to created bootable USB media from a variety of image formats, including ISO, WIM, IMG and VHD. Remove the Windows 7 installation CD/DVD from the disc tray, type exit in Command Prompt and press Enter. So maybe Ventoy also need a shim as fedora/ubuntu does. When secure boot is enabled, only .efi/kernel/drivers need to be signed. On my other Laptop from other Manufacturer is booting without error. On one of my Laptop Problem with HBCD_PE_x64.iso Uefi on start from Desktop error with Autoit v3: Pintool.exe Application error. Worked fine for me on my Thinkpad T420. It seems the original USB drive was bad after all. 1. KANOTIX uses a hybrid ISO layout, it definitely has X64 UEFI in ISO9660 and FAT12 (usually 1MiB offset). Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-32-1.6.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. And that is the right thing to do. But, currently, that is not the case at all, which means that, independently of the merits of Secure Boot for this or that type of media (which is a completely different debate altogether), there is a breach of the security contract that the user expects to see enforced and therefore something that needs to be addressed. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-XFCE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200402-Media - 925 MB, star-kirk-2.1.0-xfce-amd64-live.iso - 518 MB, Porteus-CINNAMON-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso - 300 MB